Tag

eviction attorney south africa Archives | Page 3 of 7 | Eviction Lawyers South Africa

Johannesburg residents head to court to fight ‘unlawful’ evictions

By | COVID 19, Eviction law case summaries, Eviction news, Eviction notice, Eviction orders, Evictions

Francina (last name unknown) stands beside the remains of her demolished shack. The shack cost her R2,800 to set up. She took a year to save the money. (Photo: Shiraaz Mohamed)

Residents in an informal settlement in the south of Johannesburg have gone to court to challenge their recent eviction, which they say was illegal and left them homeless and destitute in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic.

Residents of the Nana’s Farm informal settlement in Klipriviersoog, which sits between Eldorado Park and Lenasia in Johannesburg’s south, have gone to the South Gauteng High Court to challenge their recent eviction and demolition of their shacks.

In an application against the City of Johannesburg, SAPS, JMPD and SANDF, heard on 24 July 2020, residents argued that the city did not have a court order when it evicted an estimated 300 families and demolished their shacks on 18 and 19 July, rendering them homeless during the health and economic crises caused by Covid-19.

Grace Chauke, the first applicant who admitted she and others have illegally occupied the vacant land from as far back as 1990, said the city had ignored State of Disaster regulations and directives from Human Settlements, Water and Sanitation Minister Lindiwe Sisulu when it evicted many residents in the area without a court order.

Residents want compensation from the City and for the court to provide an interdict to prevent further evictions. They also want the evictions declared unlawful and a violation of their constitutional rights to dignity and security.

“The Applicants at the draft of this application remain homeless and destitute, making them prone to elements of danger and most especially the Covid-19,” said Chauke in her affidavit to the court.

Chauke, represented by Lawyers for Black People SA, which were referred to the community by an EFF member, said the City had acted like a law unto itself by evicting residents without a court order, and committed a “gross violation of the law and regulations put in place during the lockdown”.

She said city officials arrived in the area on the evening of 18 July with JMPD, SAPS and SANDF members, and started removing belongings from households without explanation.

“When the Applicants tried to understand what was going on, members of the [SAPS and JMPD] threatened to shoot and beat up those who would attempt to prevent them from doing their work,” she told the court.

“The conduct of the [City of Johannesburg] who authorised the unlawful act is tantamount to no regard of the law at all.”

In her court papers, she mentioned another woman who she said was given five minutes by the authorities to leave her shack before it was demolished. She and the woman and her husband are unemployed and now homeless with a two-month-old baby.

A number of municipalities across the country have continued to evict residents during the pandemic, leading Sisulu to warn that evictions are prohibited under lockdown regulations.

However, she has also said new land occupations, which are reported to have increased, are also against the law and authorities should go to court if they want to evict residents.

“Invasion of land is illegal. But at the same time, once somebody is in a house that has been put up, the law enforcement agencies are required to approach the courts to get permission to do something about that,” Sisulu told the National Council of Provinces earlier in July.

Residents who were evicted in Klipriviersoog are adamant that they occupied the land between 1990 and 2018, but they argue that the City of Johannesburg is still obligated to get a court order even if they occupied the land recently.

They say they are now more at risk of contracting and spreading Covid-19.

“The President of the Republic ordered that everyone stays at home during the lockdown… what home is then left for the Applicants if the same government can destroy them,” said Chauke.

The City of Johannesburg has argued that the demolitions were lawful as they only targeted shacks built recently.

Johannesburg Mayor Geoff Makhubo visited the area after residents protested against the evictions.

“Whoever has been here for the longest of time is allowed to stay here. We need to do an impromptu inspection. We can tell if a shack was built yesterday. We were not born yesterday. We can tell these things. We are not going to allow any more growth. Any new shacks will be dealt with,” he said.

The Western Cape High Court recently ruled that the City of Cape Town acted unlawfully when it evicted and demolished the property of a Hangberg resident who illegally occupied land and built a house during the lockdown.

In that case, Judge Gayaat Salie-Hlophe said “in the absence of an eviction order, and with that an order expressly stating that it is just and equitable to do so, demolitions of homes cannot be carried out lawfully at present, during alert Levels 3 and 4”.

Meanwhile, lawyers for Nana’s Farm residents as well as the Johannesburg municipality were conducting an audit on Monday of which shacks were demolished in the area, as photos submitted to the court showed that a number of shacks were still standing.

The case is likely to continue on Thursday, said Zuko Madikane from Lawyers for Black People SA.

 

Reprinted from Maverick Citizen by Greg Nicolson

 

Simon Dippenaar & Associates, Inc. is a firm of specialist eviction lawyers, based in Cape Town and now operating in Johannesburg and Durban, helping both landlords and tenants with the eviction process. Contact one of our attorneys on 086 099 5146 or sdippenaar@sdlaw.co.za if you need advice on the eviction process or if you are facing unlawful eviction.

Further Reading:

Residents upset after Hangberg ruling

By | Eviction news, Eviction notice, Eviction orders, Eviction videos, Evictions

‘Very upset’ residents called Plato after Hangberg ruling, he tells Parliament

Reprinted from News 24 by Jan Gerber

Dan Plato. (Netwerk24)

Dan Plato. (Netwerk24)
  • Cape Town Mayor Dan Plato said he received many calls from disgruntled residents after the Western Cape High Court ordered the City to rebuild a house in Hangberg which it had demolished.
  • He said one house was preventing a development on the site, which residents were looking forward to.
  • The mayor said the City must protect its land, otherwise it won’t be able to build proper houses.

Cape Town Mayor Dan Plato said he received many calls from Hangberg residents who were “very upset” about a High Court ruling ordering the City to rebuild a house it had demolished in the area.Plato and his team were briefing the Portfolio Committee on Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs on the City’s human settlements policy.

In the court ruling, Judge Gayaat Salie-Hlophe ordered the City to immediately rebuild Ginola Phillips’ demolished house to the same size and dimensions it was, describing the City’s conduct as “deplorable, grotesque and without care for human dignity”.

News24 reported that the City was considering its options because the order to rebuild the single illegal Wendy house jeopardised the construction of a “valuable community facility”, which included a five-a-side soccer pitch.

A group called the Community of Hangberg, brought the application as the first applicant, with Phillips as the second, in response to the City of Cape Town’s dismantling of Phillips’ home in Hangberg, Hout Bay, twice in June. The City of Cape Town was the first respondent and Plato was the second.

“Mayor, I want to ask you, how do you feel after losing the court case?” EFF MP Hlengiwe Mkhaliphi asked.

“Most of the time, you run to the court, most of the time you win. This time you lost.”

She said they knew very well that the poorest of the poor couldn’t afford to defend themselves in court.

“Yes, it was negative for the City,” Plato responded. He added that they offered Phillips alternative sites on two occasions, but that he refused.

The City of Cape Town has been ordered by the High Court to rebuild a man’s small wendy-house home – within 48 hours. But in response, the City has advised it is “considering its options regarding the judgment”.

He told the committee he received lots of calls from residents “very upset” with the ruling because they were looking forward to the services that would have been provided through the City’s use of the site.

One house was stopping the development of the site, he pointed out.

“Many people abuse the lockdown measures,” he said. “They abuse the regulations for their own interests.”

Mkhaliphi also asked if he tried to contact Bulelani Qolani, a man who was dragged out of his house naked by City law enforcement officials in Khayelitsha.

Plato said he tried to and asked community organisations in Khayelitsha to help him track the man down.

“But I got the sense he doesn’t want to talk to me,” Plato said.

“We are not heartless,” Plato said.

“We are not excited about evictions.”

Simon Dippenaar & Associates, Inc. is a firm of specialist eviction lawyers, based in Cape Town and now operating in Johannesburg and Durban, helping both landlords and tenants with the eviction process. Contact one of our attorneys on 086 099 5146 or sdippenaar@sdlaw.co.za if you need advice on the eviction process or if you are facing unlawful eviction.

Further Reading:

Evictions: When is a shack occupied and when is it not?

By | Eviction news, Eviction notice, Eviction orders, Evictions

The battle to find out which criteria are used by the City of Cape Town

Sisanda Nyanga stands around her belongings after her home was demolished and removed from Empolweni last month. Archive photo: Brenton Geach

When is a shack occupied and when is it unoccupied? The question is important because the law says that shacks which are occupied cannot be demolished without an eviction order. It is especially important in lockdown, when evictions are expressly forbidden. Yet it is surprisingly difficult to find out exactly what criteria are used by the authorities to decide.

On 28 March, following calls from civil society, Justice Minister Ronald Lamola announced that there would be a moratorium on evictions during the lockdown period.

But on 11 April, the City of Cape Town’s Law Enforcement officers demolished some 30 shacks in Empolweni. When our reporter arrived on the scene after the demolitions had taken place, he saw beds, paraffin stoves, blankets and other personal belongings strewn around, suggesting that people had been living in the shacks.

At the time, Mayco Member for Human Settlements Malusi Booi said this was not an eviction. He said the court had granted the City an order (in 2018) to remove “unoccupied and unfinished structures in line with the provisions of the law and based on advice from legal professionals”.

“These structures were illegally erected on City-owned land. Land invasions are illegal,” he said.

A few days later, GroundUp saw rebuilt structures which people were using for shelter being destroyed by the Anti Land Invasion Unit (ALIU) and City law enforcement.

In response to the City’s actions, the Legal Resources Centre brought an application before the Western Cape High Court on behalf of 49 families affected by the ALIU’s actions, arguing that this action was an effective eviction, and contrary to the lockdown’s no evictions rule.

In an affidavit, Jason Buchener, Senior Field Officer in the ALIU, confirmed that the City had demolished 42 structures at Empolweni on 9 April and 56 on 11 April. “All of the structures which were dismantled by the contractor were vacant” and “contained no possessions”, he said.

Buchener also described what he called a “staged” occupation, in which people were placing furniture inside structures while the ALIU was in the process of tearing them down.

“One could see that nobody occupied the structures [n]or that it constituted a home. We also saw people carrying items of furniture and placing it in structures while we were present at the property.”

In his affidavit, Empolweni resident Nkuthazo Habile claimed that he and his family had lived on the site since November 2019, when they were forced to leave rented accommodation in nearby Makhaza. According to Habile, most of the 49 households that went to court had moved onto the land in March 2020, though some did move after the lockdown commenced.

The Prevention of Illegal Evictions Act defines a building or structure as “any hut, shack, tent or similar structure or any other form of temporary or permanent dwelling or shelter”. An unlawful occupier is “a person who occupies land without the express or tacit consent of the owner or person in charge, or without any other right in law to occupy such land”. There is no definition of when a shack is occupied and when it is not.

The Constitutional Court has said that completed structures are likely to be occupied.

In the case of the Lamontville shack-dwellers in eThekwini, KwaZulu-Natal, whose structures were destroyed 24 times by the municipal anti-land invasion unit, Judge Raymond Zondo wrote, in his evaluation of whether these shacks were occupied: “The fact that there were completed structures on the property makes it likely that there were people living in those structures.”

In an attempt to find out how the City of Cape Town distinguishes between occupied and unoccupied shacks, GroundUp asked the City the following questions on 16 April:

  • Is there a standard definition of occupancy used by the City?
  • Is the presence of furniture, but not people, enough to count a structure as unoccupied?
  • Is there an LSM-like test of the kind of furniture present – a mattress isn’t sufficient, but a television is?
  • What definition has the City’s legal department used in its papers in this case?
  • How does Law Enforcement make the distinction between occupied or unoccupied structures when they are engaging in an operation?

In response to these questions, Booi provided the following answer:

“Each case is assessed on merit and also in terms of legal prescripts consonant with the provisions of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act. This is what determines the interpretation. To note: This is not an eviction and we act within the parameters of the existing court order and legislation. The case is before the court and the law must take its course. The City asks all stakeholders to respect the legal process that is under way and to give the court space to deal with the matter.”

“In Khayelitsha [Empolweni], the City removed illegally erected unoccupied structures in accordance with an interdict that prohibits further and attempted invasion on the site in question. This was not an eviction in terms of the Prevention of Illegal Evictions Act.”

On 14 April, Judge Brian Hack ruled that 130 people in 49 households should be allowed back onto the land and should have their building materials restored to them. In response, the City interpreted Judge Hack’s relief as being granted for “humanitarian” purposes.

Reprinted  from Ground Up 2020-05-22. Original links retained. Additional links by SD Law.

*Simon Dippenaar & Associates, Inc. is a firm of specialist eviction lawyers, based in Cape Town and now operating in Johannesburg and Durban, helping both landlords and tenants with the eviction process. Contact one of our attorneys on 086 099 5146 or sdippenaar@sdlaw.co.za if you need advice on the eviction process or want to know the cost of eviction.

Further reading:

Eviction hearings to continue during Covid-19 epidemic

Court clears city on informal settlement evictions amid lockdown

Police evict migrant squatters from Cape Town’s busy square