Category

COVID 19

Mandatory vaccinations in your complex?

By | COVID 19, Vaccination

‘No, your townhouse or residential estate agents cannot force you to get vaccinated’, law expert weighs in on mandatory vaccinations

Reprinted from iol.co.za, by Se-Anne Rall  – 2021-11-16

Durban – Despite a large number of organisations enforcing mandatory vaccinations for staff, management at townhouse complexes or residential estates cannot force residents or visitors to issue proof of vaccination to use facilities.

According to specialist community schemes attorney and BBM Law director, Marina Constas, if organisations and some restaurants are saying that staff and patrons must produce proof of vaccination in order to work in the office or dine in the establishment, it may seem reasonable, sensible and even necessary for bodies corporate and homeowners association members to expect the same from the residents and visitors to community housing schemes like sectional title complexes, apartment blocks, residential estates and retirement villages.

“However, I believe they would be overreaching and unlikely to succeed in implementing a vaccine mandate,” she said.

Mandatory Covid-19 vaccines for staff members have been announced by numerous organisations around the world – from Facebook and Ford to the Walt Disney Company and Walmart. In South Africa, Discovery and Sanlam, among others, have announced their plans to mandate Covid vaccination for employees with effect from specified dates.

“In my view, a vaccine mandate for residents or a blanket refusal to have non-vaccinated visitors in the building would be unreasonable. However, ensuring that legally required safety measures such as face masks, hand sanitising and limited numbers at gatherings are enforced is not just reasonable, but is an obligation for trustees, bodies corporate and homeowners associations,” Constas said.

Constas explains that common property is owned by all members of the body corporate, which is all the owners in the complex. “Every owner has an undivided share of the complex’s common property and cannot be prevented from using it.

She explained that currently, no definitive decision has been made by the High Court in South Africa regarding vaccine mandates.

Constas said while companies are exercising their right to mandate vaccines for their staff, the fact of the matter is that we do not yet have specific laws or court decisions on mandatory vaccines in relation to the fight against Covid-19.

“Without a relevant law such as a public health order or a valid by-law, there would be no legal basis for sectional title trustees or homeowners association directors to mandate vaccination among residents in their community scheme or for visitors,” she said.

Constas said that they could consider adding this to the complex rules but could be challenged on the basis that rules must be reasonable and not discriminatory. She added that if health issues or religious beliefs are valid reasons not to have the Covid vaccine, then it is possible that a blanket mandatory vaccination rule could be construed as discriminatory in some cases.

“There are also issues around the protection of personal information to be considered. With the enactment of the Protection of Personal Information Act, every community housing scheme must have a POPI policy. It must specify the type of personal information that the complex collects and holds, as well as how the complex collects and stores the personal information of residents and visitors. Could this be expanded to include the personal medical information of residents and visitors, like their vaccination status? Right now, there is no legal basis for this,” Constas said.

She said trustees seeking to implement vaccine mandates could consider the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act’s stipulation that every sectional title body corporate must act in the best interests of the body corporate and for the benefit of the owners of units in the scheme.

“Section 7 of the Act delegates this responsibility to trustees, who may argue that a vaccine mandate is in everyone’s best interests and benefits the owners of units. Since the Act does not specify what these ‘best interests’ are, it could be open to interpretation. This is a very complex issue. The trustees and directors of community housing schemes have a vital role to play in ending this pandemic and must ensure that they comply with regulations and meet their obligations,” she said.

Constas said they had an obligation to take all reasonable steps to ensure that a resident does not contravene the law, and this includes the Covid-19 restrictions and regulations.

“However, the community scheme cannot exceed its powers and make different or conflicting rules or directives contrary to the national legislation, which is the Disaster Management Act 57 of 2002 and Regulations, as well as the Community Schemes Ombud’s Directives,” she concluded.


Simon Dippenaar & Associates, Inc. is a Cape Town law firm of specialist eviction lawyers, now operating in Johannesburg and Durban, helping both landlords and tenants with rental property issues. Contact one of our eviction attorneys on 086 099 5146 or simon@sdlaw.co.za if you need advice on the eviction process or if you need help with any aspect of a lease or landlord-tenant relations.

Further reading:

Can a landlord make vaccination a condition in a lease agreement?

By | COVID 19, Rental Housing Act, Vaccination

Can a landlord make COVID-19 vaccination a condition for rental?

Reprinted from Fin24, by Allison Jeftha – 2021-11-06

A Fin24 reader wants to know if a landlord can make vaccination a requirement for a residential lease.

He writes:

Can a landlord make vaccination a condition in a lease agreement?

Michelle Dickens, Chief Executive Officer at TPN Credit Bureau responds:

The National State of Disaster Regulations specifically regulates Rental Housing and Evictions during the various alert levels. These Regulations are in addition to the Rental Housing Act and provincial Unfair Practice Regulations.

Effectively, tenants are protected from being evicted without a court order and evictions are stayed until the termination of the National State of Disaster. The latest extension of the National State of Disaster was renewed to 15 December 2021. These monthly extensions are expected to continue into 2022.

Specifically, during the National State of Disaster, the courts can suspend the stay of eviction.

In other words, they can grant the eviction order only if it is just and equitable after considering if the tenant will have access to a place of residence and basic services to protect their health, the impact of the disaster on the tenant, the tenant’s access to legal services and if adequate measures are in place to protect the health of the tenant after relocating.

These State of Disaster Regulations reference the tenant’s health in multiple sections when a court is considering whether to grant or stay the eviction order.

The Rental Housing Act specifically outlaws discrimination on the basis of race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, sexual orientation, ethnic or social origin, colour, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.

Current market dynamics highlight that it is a tenant’s market – with high vacancies and low escalations. Landlords opting to limit their portfolio to vaccinated tenants may be considering the health risk of their tenant portfolio with specific reference to the National State of Disaster.


Simon Dippenaar & Associates, Inc. is a Cape Town law firm of specialist eviction lawyers, now operating in Johannesburg and Durban, helping both landlords and tenants with rental property issues. Contact one of our eviction attorneys on 086 099 5146 or simon@sdlaw.co.za if you need advice on the eviction process or if you need help with any aspect of a lease or landlord-tenant relations.

Further reading:

Call for moratorium on court magistrates granting eviction orders

By | COVID 19, Evicting a family member, Eviction news, Eviction orders

Reprinted from IOL, by Mthuthuzeli Ntseku – 2021-06-23

Non-profit organisation Ndifuna Ukwazi calls for moratorium on eviction orders

Non-profit organisation Ndifuna Ukwazi said evictions under alert level 3 remained prohibited unless a court ordered otherwise. File picture: Henk Kruger/African News agency (ANA)

Cape Town – The Ukubavimba Foundation has called on Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, Ronald Lamola, to place a moratorium on court magistrates granting eviction orders.
This as a family of six from Atlantis is facing possible eviction after a family member got an eviction order to throw them out of the house they have been occupying for 35 years.

Speaking on behalf of the family, activist Verona October said the family had been living in the house since birth, but now their aunt wanted to evict them.

“The sheriff was recently at the family home, and we want to know what this eviction is based on. Earlier this year the aunt got people to rent the house, and now she wants to evict the family. They haven’t received a letter of eviction, but we are aware of her intention to get them evicted. The family has been living in their late grandfather’s house since birth, and they know no other home but this one,” she said.

Foundation activist Deon Carelse said it was a constitutional matter, adding that evictions increased homelessness.

“Minister Lamola is in charge of the courts, and with the judges that under his authority he can bar them from signing these eviction orders. Our Constitution tells us that there should be adequate housing for all, and that is a basic human right. For a court judge to grant an eviction order is unconstitutional.

“Currently we are under alert level 3, and with the national lockdown it is unconstitutional to evict a person. These evictions, whether private or farm evictions, are unlawful and unjust. An eviction order to be granted by a court does not do justice to the evicted families; it is inhumane, especially at this time of the year,” said Carelse.

Non-profit organisation Ndifuna Ukwazi said evictions under alert level 3 remained prohibited unless a court ordered otherwise.

“This means the sheriff cannot physically remove you from your home until the State of Disaster ends, unless the court specifically orders that it is just and equitable for the eviction to be carried out before then,” the organisation said.

It said courts must always consider all factors, including the reason for an eviction, evictees’ personal circumstances, especially the elderly, children and people with specific needs, and whether alternative accommodation was available.


For further information

SD Law is a law firm in Cape Town and Johannesburg with specialist eviction lawyers. If you are seeking an eviction, we will make sure you meet the court’s requirements. Contact Cape Town attorney Simon Dippenaar on 086 099 5146 or email sdippenaar@sdlaw.co.za.

Further reading: