Category

PIE

Legal reasons you can evict a tenant

Legal reasons for eviction

By | Eviction notice, Evictions, PIE, Tenants

Why can you legally evict a tenant?

As a landlord, you have a responsibility to your tenants. Your property may be an income-earning asset to you, but you must never lose sight of the fact that, to your tenants, it is home. Evicting a tenant is not an action you should enter into lightly, not least because it could cost you a considerable amount, both in legal costs and in lost income, should it take you a while to find another tenant. Unfortunately, sometimes the contract between landlord and tenant becomes strained. If you are unhappy with your tenants, there is a process to follow. But first you must have a legitimate reason for seeking an eviction order. What are the legal reasons for eviction?

Complete guide (recommended starting point):

For a consolidated, attorney-written eviction guide (PIE Act procedure, Sheriff service, municipal notice, timelines, costs, urgent eviction, and landlord/occupier “traps”), see:
https://www.sdlaw.co.za/evictions-south-africa/

This is the best page to read first if you want a full process overview before drilling into individual scenarios.

Breach of lease agreement

The rental agreement, or lease, lists the terms and conditions of the tenancy. It provides protection to both landlord and tenant in the event of either party failing to fulfil their contractual obligations. Basically, any breach of the lease agreement by the tenant is a legitimate reason for you to cancel the lease. At this point it is very important that you understand the difference between cancelling the lease and evicting a tenant. Eviction is a legal process that is carried out via court order and the intervention of the sheriff (if necessary). Eviction is not in the hands of the landlord. See Eviction – how does it work? for an explanation of the proper procedure. Your lease should have a clause in it detailing the consequences of breaching any of the terms of the lease. What constitutes a breach? There are several circumstances.

Rental arrears

The most common breach is non-payment of rent. It is up to you how much leniency you wish to exhibit. If a tenant is a day or two late with the rent one month and they are otherwise a good tenant, it may be that the bank has made a mistake or some other human error has occurred. Tenants often set up debit orders to go out on the 29th of the month, to ensure the landlord receives the rent by the first of the following month. February always causes problems! Give your tenant a call and let them know you haven’t received the rent; this usually sorts the matter. If the rent is still not paid, or if you have experienced repeated incidents of this nature with no explanation and the rent is now in arrears, your tenant is in breach of the lease agreement. You are legally entitled to start eviction proceedings.

Illegal activities

If you discover that your tenant is engaging in criminal behaviour, this is a reason to start the eviction process. This might involve harbouring and/or selling stolen goods; dealing drugs, including cannabis (remember possession of cannabis is legal for personal use, but selling it is not); or using the premises for sex work (whatever your views one way or the other, sex work is still illegal in South Africa). The difficulty comes in proving your suspicions. You cannot claim a breach of the lease on a hunch. But don’t take the law into your own hands. If you have reason to suspect a crime is being committed, report it to the police and let them handle it. Only once you are certain your tenant is carrying out illegal activities may you begin the eviction process.

End of the lease agreement

Most lease agreements run for one year, occasionally two years, less commonly six months. At the end of the lease period, there is usually an option to renew, but it is not compulsory that you extend the lease. You may have decided to sell the property or move back in. If your tenant continues to occupy the property after the lease has expired or been terminated, and you have given notice according to the lease agreement and legislation, the tenant is now an illegal occupier and is required to vacate the property. If they don’t leave of their own accord, you may have to go to court to start the eviction process.

Violation of the lease terms and condition

If your tenant is in violation of the terms you have agreed other than rent, this constitutes a breach of the lease agreement, just as non-payment of rent does. The same process should be followed. In the first instance, speak to the tenant informally about your concerns and ask them to rectify the matter. If this does not work, send a letter notifying them that they are in breach and giving them a time frame (determined by legislation) to put things right. If they fail to do so, you are entitled to start the eviction process. Violations include pets on the property when the lease does not allow pets; excessive noise (i.e., nuisance complaints); unauthorised or excessive numbers of occupants (i.e., the property is being used as a commune when the lease specifies a maximum of e.g. four inhabitants; subletting without permission, or use of the property for purposes other than indicated in the lease (i.e., running a retail business from a non-commercial property).

Health and safety issues

It’s unusual, but occasionally tenants violate health and safety rules, putting themselves and neighbours at risk. A case arose a few years ago of a mushroom farm whose compost was causing such noxious odours that neighbours took the farm to court (see Nuisance law – when an odour mushrooms out of control). In this case, the farm was owned and not rented and the court case involved nuisance law rather than eviction. Had the offenders been tenants, the landlords would also have had a case against them.

Property damage

Most leases have a clause about the respective responsibilities of landlord and tenant, usually divided between maintaining the fabric of the building, which is the owner’s responsibility, and keeping the property generally clean and well maintained, which is the tenant’s duty. If the occupant is negligent and fails to reasonably maintain the property or advise the owner of structural problems, the landlord can seek eviction. For example, if the roof is leaking and water ingress is causing damage to walls, and the tenant does not notify the landlord, this is neglect. If the tenant accidentally or willfully breaks fixtures and does not repair them, this is damage. The damage must be significant for there to be grounds for eviction, and there must be evidence (i.e., photos).

Eviction procedure

Before undertaking a formal eviction process, you must send notice to the tenant informing them of the breach of the lease agreement, with specific reference to the clause they have violated. Give your tenant a reasonable chance to put things right (see Letter of demand). Inform them that only if no action is taken in that time will you cancel the lease. We can draft the letter and send it on your behalf. Many tenants will take a lawyer’s letter more seriously than one from the landlord alone.

Contact us

At Simon Dippenaar & Associates we are specialists in property law. We know rental housing legislation and the Consumer Protection Act inside out and we act for both landlords and tenants, so we know the challenges faced by both parties. Contact one of our eviction attorneys on 086 099 5146 or simon@sdlaw.co.za if you need advice on letters of demand or the eviction process.

The Right Letter of Demand

Letter of demand

By | Lease Agreement, PIE, Rent, Rental Housing Act, Tenants

How to ensure the correct documentation with defaulting tenants

What happens if tenants stop paying rent? How can a property owner legally demand payment? What does rental housing legislation require? The answers depend on the nature of the lease and the nature of the tenants.

Consumer Protection Act

The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) governs fixed-term agreements between persons. A lease agreement falls into this category. A landlord must give the tenant 20 business days’ notice to rectify any breaches with the lease agreement (e.g., late rental). If the tenant pays the amount owed within this time frame, the matter is resolved. If not, the landlord is entitled to terminate the lease agreement and seek new tenants – hopefully ones who will always pay their rent on time.

Rental housing is governed by more than one piece of legislation. The Rental Housing Act 50 of 1999, Rental Housing Amendment Act 35 of 2014, and Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 (PIE) apply, along with the CPA. In determining the application of the CPA, there are two key factors to consider.

  1. Is the lease agreement for a fixed period? 

This is fairly standard with lease agreements. The most common period is one year, but two years and six months are also found. If the lease is not a fixed-term agreement, it is known as a month-to-month lease agreement. The CPA does not apply to month-to-month leases and the landlord can give the defaulting tenants a seven-day letter of demand for the money.

However, this is not the same as eviction. The Rental Housing Act 1999 requires the landlord to give the tenants one calendar month’s notice to vacate the premises.

If the lease is for a fixed period, the CPA applies and the tenants must be allowed 20 business days to rectify the breach. Only if the breach is not rectified can the eviction process begin.

If the lease was for a fixed period but has since expired, and the tenants have remained in the property by mutual consent, this is considered a month-to-month lease agreement operating on the same terms as the original lease agreement. These terms will continue to apply to the month-to-month lease. CPA will not apply and the seven-day letter of demand can be used. When it comes to giving notice to leave the property, the notice period stated in the original lease applies. If no notice period is specified in the lease, a minimum of one calendar month’s notice is required.

  1. Are the tenants a natural person or a juristic person?

If they are a natural person the CPA applies and 20 business days’ notice is required.

If they are a juristic person then the process to follow depends on their size and value. If the annual turnover or asset value does not exceed R2 million the CPA applies, along with 20 business days’ notice. If turnover or value exceeds R2 million, CPA does not apply and a seven-day letter of demand can be issued.

The following infographic shows the process to follow:

Source: TPN Credit Bureau

For further information

Simon Dippenaar & Associates, Inc. is a Cape Town law firm of specialist eviction lawyers, now operating in Johannesburg and Durban, helping both landlords and tenants with the eviction process. Contact one of our eviction attorneys on 086 099 5146 or simon@sdlaw.co.za if you need advice on letters of demand or the eviction process.

Further reading:

 

Lobby challenges eviction of 101-year-old woman

By | Appeal of an eviction order, Evicting a family member, Eviction news, PIE

Reprinted from Sowetan Live, by Penwell Dlamini – 2022-10-17

A civil society group has filed an urgent application in the Johannesburg High Court to challenge the eviction of a 101-year-old woman from a house in Meadowlands, Soweto.

On October 5, Kenaope Mosidi was evicted from the house where she lived with her granddaughter Patricia Mosidi. A video of a frail Mosidi leaving the home was shared on social media with the public expressing outrage. Patricia took care of Mosidi as all her children are now deceased.

The man who evicted the family was Jacob Moalusi who said he bought the house from Mosidi’s other granddaughter Kedibone Demake.

He told the SABC that Mosidi’s grandchildren brought her from Rustenburg where she has a home just to use her so that they cannot lose the house.

Lawyers For Black People (BLA), an organisation which aims to protect the human rights of the marginalised, wants Mosidi and her family to return to her home, arguing that the eviction was unlawful.

In the court papers lawyers said Mosidi and her family had been [living on] the property since 2017 and their eviction was done without an eviction order.

“The eviction was not in terms of any law or court order. The manner in which the persons concerned were evicted, treated and assaulted was in and itself unlawful. The first respondent and his people conducted such unlawful and illegal evictions without having regard to the rights of women and children as promulgated under the Constitution of the Republic of SA Act 108 of 1996,” the lawyers argued in the papers.

BLA argued that Moalusi did not provide any written notice ordering the Mosidi family to vacate.

“In this instance there was no valid court order to evict and remove the occupiers, thus making the eviction completely unlawful and unconstitutional in all respects of law and against the principles of natural justice,” the lawyers argued.

“The first respondent more importantly conducted the eviction without the assistance of the sheriff who is by law entrusted with the responsibility to execute and enforce court order, thug giving more clarity on the undoubtable fact that the eviction was unlawful and unconstitutional,” BLA said.

BLA further described the eviction as inhumane.

It argued that even if Moalusi was entitled to evict the family, the court would still not sanction the execution until it is satisfied that the occupiers of the house would not be left homeless.


For further information

Simon Dippenaar & Associates, Inc. is a Cape Town law firm of specialist eviction lawyers, now operating in Johannesburg and Durban, helping both landlords and tenants with the eviction process. Contact one of our eviction attorneys on 086 099 5146 or simon@sdlaw.co.za if you are concerned about unlawful eviction or if you need advice on the eviction process.

Further reading: